Published on:

Mark Pearcy Has Received Several Tax Liens

By

Mark PearcyPublic records published by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and accessed on May 8, 2018 indicate that California-based MML Investors Services broker/adviser Mark Pearcy has received a customer dispute and several tax liens. Fitapelli Kurta is interested in hearing from investors who have complaints regarding Mr. Pearcy (CRD# 2978026).

Mark Pearcy has spent 20 years in the securities industry and has been registered with MML Investors Services in San Diego, California since March 2017. Previous registrations include MSI Financial Services in San Diego, California (1997-2017) and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in San Diego, California (1997-2007). He has passed four securities industry examinations: Series 65 (Uniform Investment Adviser Law Examination), which he obtained on October 1, 1999; Series 63 (Uniform Securities Agent State Law Examination), which he obtained on January 20, 1998; Series 7 (General Securities Representative Examination), which he obtained on July 10, 2000; and Series 6 (Investment Company Products/Variable Contracts Representative Examination), which he obtained on December 23, 1997. He is a registered broker and investment adviser with eleven US states and territories: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and Texas.

According to his BrokerCheck report, he has received one customer complaint, two denied customer complaints, and three unsatisfied tax liens.

In February 2018 the Internal Revenue Service filed a tax lien totaling $161,397 against him. The lien remains outstanding.

In August 2017 the Internal Revenue Service filed a tax lien totaling $115,443.63 against him. The lien remains outstanding.

In 2016 the Internal Revenue Service filed a tax lien totaling $253,252.14 against him. The lien remains outstanding.

In 2015 a customer alleged Mark Pearcy, while employed at MetLife Securities, failed to follow instructions and recommended unsuitable variable annuities. The customer sought unspecified damages in the complaint, which was denied.

In 2009 a customer alleged Mark Pearcy, while employed at MetLife, recommended an unsuitable variable life insurance policy. The complaint settled for more than $105,300.

In 2009 a customer alleged Mark Pearcy, while employed at MetLife Securities, misrepresented material facts regarding mutual fund investments. The customer sought unspecified damages in the complaint, which was denied.

If you or someone you know has lost money investing with Mark Pearcy, call the experienced attorneys at Fitapelli Kurta at 877-238-4175 for a free consultation. You may be eligible to recoup your losses. Fitapelli Kurta accepts all cases on a contingency basis: we only get paid if and when you collect money. Time to file your claim may be limited, so we encourage you to avoid delay. Call 877-238-4175 now to speak to an attorney for free.